Money Money Money

Mini 02

Money is one of life’s biggest distractions*.  Why? Because money is an artificial life-energy.

*… along with other distractions like social media, email, TV, busy-brain, fame, fortune, pleasure… (we’re easily distracted). 
Late in the Babylonian Empire, King Belshazzar and his minions were enjoying a drunken feast, reveling in their riches, when a hand suddenly materialized in thin air behind the king and scrawled a message on the wall: Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin (count, count, weigh, divide), as if to say, “A little obsessed with the spoils, are we?” It was apparently a warning about the material preoccupations that still bother us humans today.

Life-energy is the biggest deal throughout the cosmos. It is, literally, everything. Religions call it holy spirit, prana, and the universal life force, and it’s believed to come from a central cosmic source called God or Brahman. Here are the differences between life-energy and money:

Life-energy creates and nourishes everything everywhere with vitality and goodness.

Money is a “social energy” devised by us humans to create and nourish our social systems and to enrich our lives.

There are lots of differences between life-energy (the real stuff) and money (the fake stuff), especially in the way they’re distributed and in the way they work:

  • Life-energy is distributed in a simple way, emitted freely by the source. It belongs to everyone and everything everywhere, since we’re all part of the source.
    Money is distributed in complicated ways, provided by governments and their banks here on Earth and managed according to bristly economic and political principles—democratic, autocratic, capitalistic, socialistic, communistic, Islamic….
  • Life-energy works in complicated ways (there’s an understatement!)—spreading boundless vitality, love, and knowledge to everything throughout the cosmos.
    Money works in simple ways; it just represents the relative value of everything associated with people and their social systems.

Life-energy is straightforward. In its purest form it embodies the boundless knowledge, goodness, and power of the source. Those qualities are shared by everyone and can be accessed by anyone who understands and acknowledges their oneness with the source and lives accordingly.

Money is problematic because people are problematic. People are problematic because life is problematic here on Earth, where living things intentionally hurt each other (predators), take stuff from each other (parasites), and squabble with each other for an advantage (competitors). Money embodies not just the perfection of the source, but also the many flaws of Earth.

So, again, the more we understand and acknowledge life-energy as the essence of everything (especially ourselves), the closer we are to the ultimate truth. Then, as we adapt that knowledge into our lives and start to behave accordingly, we start to get showered with cosmic riches and rewards, not only in this lifetime but especially on the next leg of our journey into the afterlife. Meanwhile, money and other distractions eventually become powerless against those who accept the unlimited power of the source and its life-energy.

Unknown's avatar

About Mark Macy

Main interests are other-worldly matters (www.macyafterlife.com) and worldly matters (www.noblesavageworld.com)
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Money Money Money

  1. John Day's avatar John Day says:

    A nice and timely post, Mark. Thank you for these abundance perspectives.

  2. delectablytacob7810783f2's avatar delectablytacob7810783f2 says:

    Hello Mark
    I’m having trouble logging in to wordpress so I’m replying to your email instead.

    “I will be happy when I get to spirit side and not have to even think about money. I truly believe it’s been the curse of civilisations, inciting avarice, lust for material possessions, jealousy, wars, and every other bad human trait we can think of.

    I oft wonder if other inhabited planets have our type of monetary system or what they might use other than bartering.

    I’m very happy to read your posts mark. They are always thought provoking.

    Do you still have contact with Maggie and Jules or know what/where they are now? Are they still involved with ITC? I never see any reference to them other than your work now.”
    Regards Evelyn

    Sent from Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg

    • Mark Macy's avatar Mark Macy says:

      Hi Evelyn,
      I found your comment waiting for approval.
      Sorry about the delay getting it posted.

      Like any powerful energy of our world, money certainly seems to bring out the best and worst of us.
      I’ve wondered the same thing about other material civilizations beyond the Earth… if they also contend with money.
      My guess or suspicion is that it’s unlikely.
      I believe most civilizations beyond the Earth (physical or spiritual) are inhabited by beings who are consciously tapped in to their life-energy connections with each other, with other life forms in their world, and also with the other spiritual beings who are not IN their world but are still “close” to it and associated with the inhabitants. (what we call ancestral spirits, spirit guides, etc.)
      Sharing of thoughts, information, and whatever “products and resources” they need to sustain their lives (the way we drink water and eat food) is probably transacted mentally (with consciousness) for the most part.
      The use of money, alphabets, and other symbols that we take for granted on Earth is (I suspect) probably a rarity throughout the cosmos.

      I haven’t heard from Maggy and Jules for years.
      What they did for humanity was historic and world-changing (in my opinion)… although world changes of that magnitude take time to coalesce.
      The best I can do is try to make sense of the amazing information they (and our INIT group) received late last century… while correlating it with more familiar knowledge of science, religion, and other leaders of thought here on Earth.

      I appreciate your comment, Evelyn…

      Mark

What do you think? Comments?